I guess compensation was fair for the area, and there were no issues on that front.
It was ultimately good for my career growth as I learned a lot, and got to work with really capable technical individuals.
Too much middle management, and poorly managed.
High turnover rate (for group I was in).
Lots of red tap, as processes in the organization were really inefficient.
Flatten the organization and treat your employees better. Wish I could give you specific advice, but let's start with this... KLA clearly has a work/life balance issue, focus your efforts there, it will help with talent retention.
First interview was a simple 1 hour behavioral screener interview. Second interview was an onsite 5 hour interview with 5 members of the team. The second interview focused on resume details and technical questions.
I was recommended by a previous professor which basically means that the professor did the initial screening. After that it was an in person interview with my manager that was very casual (Khakis and a collared shirt, suit and tie not needed in my c
It was a decent interview process. Nothing out of the box or surprising. First started off with an interview call and then they started conducting the next interview rounds. It was a good process.
First interview was a simple 1 hour behavioral screener interview. Second interview was an onsite 5 hour interview with 5 members of the team. The second interview focused on resume details and technical questions.
I was recommended by a previous professor which basically means that the professor did the initial screening. After that it was an in person interview with my manager that was very casual (Khakis and a collared shirt, suit and tie not needed in my c
It was a decent interview process. Nothing out of the box or surprising. First started off with an interview call and then they started conducting the next interview rounds. It was a good process.