It was a good learning experience with great management.
There are no cons.
The team should move out from legacy technologies.
The interview process was not as simple as expected. There was an image processing round in which a team of employees came and explained a topic in image processing which they have been using in their company. This was followed by a set of questions
It consisted of a written test and a couple of interviews. Most of them are algo based questions. Also they have tested on programming well
1. Interviewer doesn't understand the basics of computer science. A good coder is 100 times better than an average coder. 2. Interviewer can't see multiple solutions to the same problem. No analytical thinking. Good place to reproduce what you read
The interview process was not as simple as expected. There was an image processing round in which a team of employees came and explained a topic in image processing which they have been using in their company. This was followed by a set of questions
It consisted of a written test and a couple of interviews. Most of them are algo based questions. Also they have tested on programming well
1. Interviewer doesn't understand the basics of computer science. A good coder is 100 times better than an average coder. 2. Interviewer can't see multiple solutions to the same problem. No analytical thinking. Good place to reproduce what you read