The interview process consisted of three phone interviews and an on-site interview.
The first interview was comprised of basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript questions, as well as an introduction. This was conducted by the recruiter.
The next two phone interviews were technical.
The first had no coding involved but focused on understanding my thought process and included more in-depth technical questions.
The second involved two coding questions: one to recreate a module with HTML and CSS, and another to perform a specific action on it using JavaScript.
The on-site interview was similar to the third phone interview. It involved four technical interviews and one session to assess my understanding of the company and my motivation for wanting to work at LinkedIn.
Overall, it was a great process, and I learned a great deal about coding and the company culture throughout.
The interviewer gave me basic HTML and CSS that created tabs and content.
Then, they told me I had to code in JavaScript to make the right content show when the corresponding tab was clicked. Specifically, when one tab was selected, the content of the other tabs had to be hidden.
The following metrics were computed from 10 interview experiences for the LinkedIn Associate Web Developer role in United States.
LinkedIn's interview process for their Associate Web Developer roles in the United States is fairly selective, failing a large portion of engineers who go through it.
Candidates reported having very good feelings for LinkedIn's Associate Web Developer interview process in United States.