The interview process consisted of four rounds:
The initial screening was conducted by a friendly and knowledgeable recruiter who asked general questions about my skills and understanding of the company's business. I was informed on the spot that I would be proceeding.
The second round was a conceptual technical interview focused on problem-solving with HTML and CSS. The third round was an online technical interview using a code-sharing platform, where I was asked to write some straightforward HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. Both of these rounds were conducted by web developers who, though a little awkward and apologetic, were generally friendly and helpful.
The final round was an onsite interview at their main campus in Mountain View. This round included four interviews in total: three technical interviews and one with a director to assess my general understanding of the company. The technical interviewers were positive and provided assistance when I encountered difficulties. The discussions during these interviews offered valuable insight into the company culture and the developers' passion for working at LinkedIn.
Overall, it was a great process.
Nothing too difficult, though one of the technical interviews asked me about JavaScript scoping and loop optimization. The questions were worded a little vaguely, which threw me off slightly. Once I understood what they were asking, answering them wasn't too difficult.
The following metrics were computed from 10 interview experiences for the LinkedIn Associate Web Developer role in United States.
LinkedIn's interview process for their Associate Web Developer roles in the United States is fairly selective, failing a large portion of engineers who go through it.
Candidates reported having very good feelings for LinkedIn's Associate Web Developer interview process in United States.