The interview process consisted of:
The process was well organized in terms of scheduling.
The interviewers seemed rigid in evaluating candidates by narrow checklists rather than engineering depth. Feedback reflected a bias towards specific solution paths, even when alternate valid approaches were discussed clearly and with tradeoffs.
The interview culture also gave little space for collaborative discussion; it felt more evaluative than explorative, especially in architecture rounds. I was also penalized for choosing a simple, scalable design before incrementally adding complexity.
Advice to Management:
Staff+ roles demand open-mindedness and an appreciation for diverse design perspectives. Encourage interviewers to listen with curiosity rather than just matching against predefined answers.
LeetCode hard questions and a couple of system design questions
The following metrics were computed from 5 interview experiences for the LinkedIn Staff Software Engineer role in India.
LinkedIn's interview process for their Staff Software Engineer roles in India is fairly selective, failing a large portion of engineers who go through it.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for LinkedIn's Staff Software Engineer interview process in India.