Standard hiring process, same as other big tech companies.
First, I received a phone call from the recruiter who explained the role. Then, there were two one-hour phone screens: the first was behavioral, and the second was a coding interview using CollabEdit.
Two days after the phone screens, I received an email from the recruiter stating that the hiring committee had decided not to proceed with an on-site interview round.
Although both phone screens went well, here are the reasons why I am rating this as a negative experience:
If the hiring committee made a decision based on this, that would be really unfortunate and unjust.
I did reach out to the recruiter asking for the reason and also when I could reapply. I did not get a response. I was expecting more from LinkedIn in terms of both professionalism and conducting fair interviews.
Note: I have more than 12 years of leadership and hands-on architecture/engineering experience in the software industry and have worked on many truly enterprise-scale projects used by many Fortune 500 and government entities.
I had a lot of questions related to my previous jobs and experiences.
Here are the questions from the coding phone screen:
The following metrics were computed from 5 interview experiences for the LinkedIn Staff Software Engineer role in Sunnyvale, California.
LinkedIn's interview process for their Staff Software Engineer roles in Sunnyvale, California is fairly selective, failing a large portion of engineers who go through it.
Candidates reported having good feelings for LinkedIn's Staff Software Engineer interview process in Sunnyvale, California.