The company is known for its top-notch talent, high-power work environment, high-quality engineering infrastructure, and company pride (for now).
The company is becoming increasingly susceptible to the usual problems of large companies: politics, flat-footedness, BS, etc. Growth prospects and company morale are currently low. Sadly, the company is a bit of a pseudo-meritocracy.
Working at LinkedIn is no longer viewed as an exclusive privilege. Better start thinking about how to retain your talent pool.
It was the first round. They asked, "Describe any one project of yours and what did you learn from it, design-wise and product-wise?" with follow-ups like, "What would you do differently right now?"
HR Phone screen where I talked to the recruiter about my background, nothing special. Then followed by Phone Technical Interview. Didn't get to pass this one. I regret not asking for more clarification questions about the second problem.
LinkedIn takes its hiring seriously and aims for high standards. If you’re well-prepared and comfortable with tough algorithm problems and scalable system design, you’ll find the process fair. However, the experience can vary depending on your inte
It was the first round. They asked, "Describe any one project of yours and what did you learn from it, design-wise and product-wise?" with follow-ups like, "What would you do differently right now?"
HR Phone screen where I talked to the recruiter about my background, nothing special. Then followed by Phone Technical Interview. Didn't get to pass this one. I regret not asking for more clarification questions about the second problem.
LinkedIn takes its hiring seriously and aims for high standards. If you’re well-prepared and comfortable with tough algorithm problems and scalable system design, you’ll find the process fair. However, the experience can vary depending on your inte