Overall, the process was good. One interview was superb because the interviewer was logical and related questions directly to the job description. They forced me to think on the spot. I really enjoyed this interview; it was one of the best I have ever experienced. This interview was scheduled for 60 minutes but was completed in 45 minutes. Outstanding.

The next interview was quite annoying, to be honest. It seemed to me that the interviewer wanted to showcase his knowledge rather than ask questions. The questions were vague and not structured logically. When I was answering the first question, I was cut off by a second, tangent question. This interview was scheduled for 30 minutes but took an hour, which speaks volumes about the unprofessionalism of the individual.

Most of the questions could be Googled, for example: "What is the range of the Reynolds number for laminar and turbulent flow in pipe flow?" I don’t understand the logic of asking such a question; Google can provide the answer. It wasn't critical for the interviewee to know the exact range. I answered with the correct range, and then the interviewer told me the range "according to his thesis," which was incidentally incorrect.

How would you cool a motor?

What would you use as coolant?