The feedback I received from the interview doesn't align with my performance. Regarding the laptop coding test, I was told I didn't add any comments or explanations for optimization, which is false. I attempted to explain this to the interviewer, but they weren't very interested and asked me to add it as a comment, which I did. In my opinion, the Javadoc comment for optimization was clear, and the algorithm's complexity was sufficient to solve the problem's constraints (n log n for 10^5 data points).

The initial debriefing took 25-30 minutes instead of the allocated 15. This was because the interviewers struggled to resolve my confusion regarding a test case. Consequently, there wasn't enough time at the end, and we finished in a hurry.

In the CS fundamentals interview, it was stated that my solution had a memory leak. However, we were dealing with approximately 40 data points, making a memory leak practically difficult to observe. A more helpful hint from the interviewer might have been to ask if such a solution could lead to potential problems at a larger scale. Aside from this, the interviewer informed me that the solution had this problem rather than asking if it had any potential issues.