Arguably the biggest brand name in the tech world to work for. You realize this when people discover that you work for Facebook – at airports, clubs, parties, etc.
He is a real genius, and weekly Q&A's with him provide a great opportunity for you to learn from his personality and way of thinking.
Every employee knows what is coming out. It is incredible that there are too few leaks.
Zuck has been able to keep the organization very tightly focused on its goals. Be it through designing the offices in a certain way, posters, T-shirts, the way of celebration, weekly Q&As, internal groups, etc., everyone seems to be focused on organizational goals.
It's quite natural, but Irish seem to favor Irish because they realize that they are going to work together longer term compared to international employees. This leads to favoritism, which reflects in (unfair) performance reviews and promotions.
Facebook is always in the news and a glamorous brand to be associated with. Some employees don't seem to handle this well and come across as very arrogant.
There is a culture of moving fast, which is not well understood by all. Oftentimes, projects are celebrated at their inception and brushed under the carpet if the results don't match the initial promise. Also, very often, you see people trying to grab credit for something they had no contribution in, but are in a good position to take credit. There are many such opportunities at Facebook since the product is great, the brand is well known, and Facebook is still growing at a tremendous rate. So, sometimes it's frustrating to see people benefiting just by pretending to contribute.
Try to balance the culture of instant glorification. This is leading to an environment where people are concerned only about short-term projects because that's what reflects in their performance review. Oftentimes, these projects are very expensive, but the cost is brushed under the carpet and the results are presented in an over-glorified manner. While this is obvious, managers have no choice but to praise it in public because it's good for their results as well.
The process was pretty smooth and a good experience. There were several rounds, but the whole process was pretty long, lasting about 4 months. I did not make it to the final round, though.
Two online assessments: one coding and the other behavioral. The coding assessment was not that hard, similar to what you find in LeetCode easy to medium difficulty. After that, I had a technical interview scheduled online. Again, I was asked to so
For phone screening sessions, before the virtual onsite. Leetcode questions, about two questions at medium levels within 45 mins. The interviewer asked about time complexity and space complexity. The interviewer doesn’t give much hints but is calm an
The process was pretty smooth and a good experience. There were several rounds, but the whole process was pretty long, lasting about 4 months. I did not make it to the final round, though.
Two online assessments: one coding and the other behavioral. The coding assessment was not that hard, similar to what you find in LeetCode easy to medium difficulty. After that, I had a technical interview scheduled online. Again, I was asked to so
For phone screening sessions, before the virtual onsite. Leetcode questions, about two questions at medium levels within 45 mins. The interviewer asked about time complexity and space complexity. The interviewer doesn’t give much hints but is calm an