Great company to work for.
Interesting problems to solve. Smart people.
Quite bad work-life balance.
A typical tech interview process: * Chat with a recruiter * Phone/in-person screen * Full loop of 4-5 engineers This typically includes: * One design question * Two coding questions * One personality/coding question The interviewers w
Tree question. Couldn't give tips at all. Interviewer was disconnected and condescending for each reject in 45 minutes. Really terrible candidate experience. There have been few good experiences with Meta.
First is the recruiter round, then a one-hour technical interview which included questions around SQL and Python. After that would be behavioural and other technical rounds. Other technical rounds would cover system design, etc.
A typical tech interview process: * Chat with a recruiter * Phone/in-person screen * Full loop of 4-5 engineers This typically includes: * One design question * Two coding questions * One personality/coding question The interviewers w
Tree question. Couldn't give tips at all. Interviewer was disconnected and condescending for each reject in 45 minutes. Really terrible candidate experience. There have been few good experiences with Meta.
First is the recruiter round, then a one-hour technical interview which included questions around SQL and Python. After that would be behavioural and other technical rounds. Other technical rounds would cover system design, etc.