The interview process was very disorganized. I was initially told there would be two stages, which then changed to five. Ultimately, I completed three stages, including the final interview (though with fewer people than initially indicated).
I was ultimately unsuccessful at the final stage, which had been described as a non-technical interview, for technical skills, despite having already passed the technical interview. I suppose two managers felt better placed to make a technical decision than their technical interviewers.
Based on my experience, I would advise against adapting your interview style based on the interviewers. For example, remain technical and do not focus entirely on managerial or soft skills in the management interview.
Microsoft asked some concerning questions during the interview, which started with phrases like, "Given this is the very top-tier support, customers expect you to be an SME on everything, so how would you cover your lack of knowledge?" This concerns me due to the complete lack of transparency and the potential for making mistakes by "covering up" a lack of skills.
I also felt there was a concerning number of questions asked in relation to dealing with customers in other countries or cultures. Their questioning went beyond what I felt was a reasonable line of concern for someone dealing with customers.
Given this is the very top-tier support, customers expect you to be a SME on everything. How would you cover your lack of knowledge?
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the Microsoft Support Escalation Engineer - Azure Rapid Response role in Reading, United Kingdom.
Microsoft's interview process for their Support Escalation Engineer - Azure Rapid Response roles in Reading, the United Kingdom is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Microsoft's Support Escalation Engineer - Azure Rapid Response interview process in Reading, United Kingdom.