Great people, great scope of problems to tackle, compensation is very competitive, and benefits are comprehensive.
In general, the company has enormous resources to actually, truly change the world in many meaningful ways. It's just a matter of the company not getting in its own way and allowing its talent to thrive.
The review process fostered competition instead of collaboration. Depending on the group, the politics became intrusive. Work-life balance was hit or miss. It largely depends on the group(s) you end up with, but the process is pretty universal.
Foster collaboration instead of competition.
Let people and teams solve problems instead of fighting for territory.
I had about five people interview me, and in the end, there was an appropriate interview. After each interview, the feedback was given to the next interviewer, and they would proceed from there.
Planning, initial communication - very good. 5 interviews. Work culture is different from group to group and varies. Offices are based on seniority. Some groups have people sharing offices, while others use cubicles.
Had multiple interviews, including one on-campus interview and then several interviews at Microsoft in Redmond. Interview questions consisted of algorithms and personal questions about your past experiences. Interviewers asked questions about sorti
I had about five people interview me, and in the end, there was an appropriate interview. After each interview, the feedback was given to the next interviewer, and they would proceed from there.
Planning, initial communication - very good. 5 interviews. Work culture is different from group to group and varies. Offices are based on seniority. Some groups have people sharing offices, while others use cubicles.
Had multiple interviews, including one on-campus interview and then several interviews at Microsoft in Redmond. Interview questions consisted of algorithms and personal questions about your past experiences. Interviewers asked questions about sorti