Good pay, good benefits, smart colleagues.
bounded by one's role, results in some inefficiency.
I had two simultaneous loops for two different positions at Microsoft and was selected for both. I ultimately accepted the one I thought was best suited for me. The interview process began with an emailed questionnaire that included personal and pro
Interviewers keep keying in their inputs. The next interviewer knows what the previous one asked and what needs to be tested. In my case: * The first asked for problem-solving. * The second, design. * The third, bug finding. * The fourth, c
A full-day process, broken into multiple individual one-on-one interviews. These interviews can include time at the blackboard, writing snippets of code or scripting. Not for the faint of heart or the unprepared.
I had two simultaneous loops for two different positions at Microsoft and was selected for both. I ultimately accepted the one I thought was best suited for me. The interview process began with an emailed questionnaire that included personal and pro
Interviewers keep keying in their inputs. The next interviewer knows what the previous one asked and what needs to be tested. In my case: * The first asked for problem-solving. * The second, design. * The third, bug finding. * The fourth, c
A full-day process, broken into multiple individual one-on-one interviews. These interviews can include time at the blackboard, writing snippets of code or scripting. Not for the faint of heart or the unprepared.