Great people and a very good company with its employees. I learned a lot.
Large and slow-moving company.
Innovates, but without a clear direction.
Too many people and projects, so the scope of the work is very limited.
Lacks a technical CEO.
Having a technical-aware CEO and investing more in crazy ideas.
The process was smooth and excellent, featuring a round of four interviews. Each interview involved meeting with individuals who had different focuses. They were specialized to specific fields, and none of the interviews felt unfair, although this c
The interview lasted for about 4 hours on the same day, with some gaps in between the rounds. First was a coding test where the interviewer asked me to write a program. He made sure to clear all my queries. Next, we had a technical discussion where
Interview Stages: * Rec Scree * Phone Screen * Onsite (LC, System Design, Manager, LC) The interview was for a specific team, so many low-level (C, C++, and OS) questions were asked.
The process was smooth and excellent, featuring a round of four interviews. Each interview involved meeting with individuals who had different focuses. They were specialized to specific fields, and none of the interviews felt unfair, although this c
The interview lasted for about 4 hours on the same day, with some gaps in between the rounds. First was a coding test where the interviewer asked me to write a program. He made sure to clear all my queries. Next, we had a technical discussion where
Interview Stages: * Rec Scree * Phone Screen * Onsite (LC, System Design, Manager, LC) The interview was for a specific team, so many low-level (C, C++, and OS) questions were asked.