Good company. Good growth. Good atmosphere.
No cons as such. All good.
The process is good, with three rounds in total. However, the absence of feedback makes the selection of candidates seem ambiguous, even after passing all rounds.
The process involved two written rounds, followed by three rounds of technical interviews. Candidates were shortlisted based on the written rounds and coding interviews. The interviews were conducted one-on-one. Results were announced just after all
I had two rounds: one technical and one HR. In both rounds, they asked DSA questions. One question was on linked lists, and the other was from Kadane's algorithm.
The process is good, with three rounds in total. However, the absence of feedback makes the selection of candidates seem ambiguous, even after passing all rounds.
The process involved two written rounds, followed by three rounds of technical interviews. Candidates were shortlisted based on the written rounds and coding interviews. The interviews were conducted one-on-one. Results were announced just after all
I had two rounds: one technical and one HR. In both rounds, they asked DSA questions. One question was on linked lists, and the other was from Kadane's algorithm.