Opportunity to work on a wide range of technologies and products.
Working through a couple of release cycles on big projects helps build a wide range of skills, essential for shipping a product.
Good benefits, lots of trainings, and tuition assistance for continuing education.
The way the review process is set up, it forces developers to put substantial efforts into being 'visible'. I think these efforts could be spent more on development activities.
Quality should be one of the very key aspects of the review process and career growth. Visibility probably has positive sides, but in reasonable amounts.
Another aspect which concerns me is that often we're 'catching up' with the competition. I think we have enough talent and resources to actually be at the front of innovation and competition.
First round OA with two questions, about LeetCode medium. Final round: three technical interviews, with coding questions. Since the JD mentioned language C, the coding question was done with C.
I had a 45-minute phone call with a recruiter regarding an engineering position. They discussed the specific team I was applying to join, as well as Microsoft's workplace culture in general.
The interview was easy. Most of the questions they asked were LeetCode easy. Unfortunately, I haven't been selected even after answering everything perfectly. I think they rejected me because of the ongoing visa issues.
First round OA with two questions, about LeetCode medium. Final round: three technical interviews, with coding questions. Since the JD mentioned language C, the coding question was done with C.
I had a 45-minute phone call with a recruiter regarding an engineering position. They discussed the specific team I was applying to join, as well as Microsoft's workplace culture in general.
The interview was easy. Most of the questions they asked were LeetCode easy. Unfortunately, I haven't been selected even after answering everything perfectly. I think they rejected me because of the ongoing visa issues.