Good, good, good, good, good.
Not bad, not bad, not bad.
I went through a phone screen which consisted of LC medium and LC hard problems. The next step was the interview. The first interviewer asked 4-5 LC questions in quick succession, ranging from medium to hard. For some, I had to write the code; for ot
The process involved several rounds of individual interviews. These included general personal questions, along with one or two technical challenges. The purpose of these technical challenges was twofold: to develop a solution and to engage in a discu
1. Technical screening with hiring manager 2. Onsite (6 hours, including 30-minute lunch) with managers and engineers. Arrogant and short-tempered managers. Never heard from the recruiter, even after following up and requesting feedback. Never expe
I went through a phone screen which consisted of LC medium and LC hard problems. The next step was the interview. The first interviewer asked 4-5 LC questions in quick succession, ranging from medium to hard. For some, I had to write the code; for ot
The process involved several rounds of individual interviews. These included general personal questions, along with one or two technical challenges. The purpose of these technical challenges was twofold: to develop a solution and to engage in a discu
1. Technical screening with hiring manager 2. Onsite (6 hours, including 30-minute lunch) with managers and engineers. Arrogant and short-tempered managers. Never heard from the recruiter, even after following up and requesting feedback. Never expe