Process involving coding exercise, "end-to-end" design and system design interview and HR round. You are given presentation of the product and always work through some feature of the product. Problems are quite interesting and there are no LeetCode puzzles. I enjoyed it very much.
Monday claims to value feedback and you always get some feedback after each round. This feedback is quite brief and it is hard to make sense of it. I got rejected after last (HR) round with feedback highlighting my deficiencies in resume (not enough experience in X), coding round (probably referring to a bug that was addressed during coding), and system design (not efficient enough -- hard to make sense on this one at all).
In the end the process is incredibly dragged out with spotty contact with HR. Grounds for rejection all refer to resume or early stages of the process and none to the final round reached. This is either incredibly inefficient time sink or perhaps dishonest feedback. Avoid if you have no time to spare.
Design or code some monday.com feature. Go play with the app and youll get the idea.
The following metrics were computed from 4 interview experiences for the Monday.com Senior Software Engineer role in Poland.
Monday.com's interview process for their Senior Software Engineer roles in Poland is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Monday.com's Senior Software Engineer interview process in Poland.