Somewhat of a pro:
They don't foster a trusting environment for the employees and ask for weekly written reports even for seniors with 10+ years' experience, though all activity is already tracked in Jira.
They don't allow home office even though company policy is 1-2 days/week.
He is also comparing work conditions in Nokia with Huawei, where people work 6 days/week and sometimes sleep in the office, only to conclude how good it is at Nokia, where (some) people are able to work from home 2 days/week.
He also used this (and the fact that being together physically as a team will foster better communication) as a basis to cut those two days to one and eventually to 0 (as opposed to more and more companies who figured out the opposite and start implementing full remote work).
It's really obvious that management doesn't really care about people.
The technical level of employees is very low. Of course, there are very good people too, but most of them are leaving and juniors are taking their place.
Substandard workspace: Huge overcrowded open offices of >120 persons, very noisy. Very, very cold in winter. After heavy rain outside, you get pools of water randomly all over the office. Crap coffee. No fruits or absolutely anything company-sponsored. Restrooms are incredibly dirty, especially in office H. Everything is cost-saving oriented, starting with the lack of dishwasher soap and paper towels.
In conclusion, I have no idea how such a badly managed company still exists. Probably thanks to Trump's ban on Huawei and Chinese vendors...
Get real. Start managing people, not numbers in spreadsheets. Start employing capable people, not just numbers to show your growth.
3 technical rounds. Stack, heap, linked list. Project-specific questions were asked. Questions on strings. What is the role of a pragme? What are #directives? Questions on Anagram strings. Questions on trees, AVL. Questions on Recursion.
It was very good, and the interviewer was very friendly. The technical questions were very challenging, which I enjoyed a lot. The questions covered theory, experimental, and practical aspects. The first round was via video conferencing. The second
The interview process was good and lengthy. I had six rounds of discussion before receiving the offer letter. It was a positive experience. I accepted the offer and am currently working with Nokia.
3 technical rounds. Stack, heap, linked list. Project-specific questions were asked. Questions on strings. What is the role of a pragme? What are #directives? Questions on Anagram strings. Questions on trees, AVL. Questions on Recursion.
It was very good, and the interviewer was very friendly. The technical questions were very challenging, which I enjoyed a lot. The questions covered theory, experimental, and practical aspects. The first round was via video conferencing. The second
The interview process was good and lengthy. I had six rounds of discussion before receiving the offer letter. It was a positive experience. I accepted the offer and am currently working with Nokia.