I applied through a recruiter. The process took 6 weeks.

The first contact was with a recruiter, who asked very basic questions and liked my profile. According to her, there would be six more stages, which was quite long. Then there was:

• Technical challenge (7 days)
• Architecture chat (1h). This moment was presenting a scenario where I had to design a solution and the architecture, file organization, and logic, without code.
• Chat with a people person (1h). There were many more specific questions about my previous and especially current experience. There were questions about how I would handle situations where I witnessed some abuse or a moment of embarrassment for a colleague in a meeting, for example.
• Pair programming with the engineering team (1h30m). It was a continuation of the technical challenge. First, I presented the project with details, dependencies, and structure. Then it was proposed to add a new functionality, which was not possible to finish in time, but we continued until we left something functional to finish the chat.

In my final feedback, they pointed out that I did not notice a bug that was in the application. This made me quite upset, since it was impossible to complete everything in time. In the beginning, they were very clear that the meeting did not have this purpose, but was more to see how I would work in a team in a pair-programming session. At the end of the feedback, they pointed out that I could try again after 6 months. However, from the experience of having taken more than 1 month and having received empty feedback, I probably will not try again. The process had its positive points, such as knowledge about the company and network, and all the people were friendly and nice.

• Why do you want to work at Nubank?