Decent pay. Projects are incredibly large and touch many teams and technologies.
Poor management, huge (5-10%) random layoffs are common. Many tools are built in-house and therefore lack the quality of documentation and support one finds with third-party and open-source tooling.
Even a little bit of transparency about job security would be an improvement.
The interview process was fairly okay. However, in one of the coding interviews, the interviewer basically accused me of using a second screen in order to cheat, just based on a hunch, which I found quite worrying and unprofessional.
Recruiter round, which was followed by a panel. The recruiter asked very basic introductory questions. The panel consisted of 5 rounds, including a standard system design round with technical tradeoffs. This was followed by other behavioral rounds, a
Recruiter call, HM screen, technical phone screen, virtual onsite (coding, system design, behavioral). Some interviewers were helpful. Some were not and intentionally missed providing a key assumption, which isn't something that can be thought about
The interview process was fairly okay. However, in one of the coding interviews, the interviewer basically accused me of using a second screen in order to cheat, just based on a hunch, which I found quite worrying and unprofessional.
Recruiter round, which was followed by a panel. The recruiter asked very basic introductory questions. The panel consisted of 5 rounds, including a standard system design round with technical tradeoffs. This was followed by other behavioral rounds, a
Recruiter call, HM screen, technical phone screen, virtual onsite (coding, system design, behavioral). Some interviewers were helpful. Some were not and intentionally missed providing a key assumption, which isn't something that can be thought about