Good salary.
Good tech stack.
Poor work-life balance. Lots of micromanagement. No performance bonus, except for top performers.
Generally, the interaction with the recruiter was positive. However, the onsite interview was not great at all. At least two interview rounds involved interviewers who didn't know the correct optimal solution. They essentially raised false doubts ab
I submitted my application via LinkedIn. After speaking with the recruiter, I had a phone screen. It involved basic questions and a coding exercise. Two weeks later, I completed the onsite interviews. I interviewed with five people from different g
Send an assignment as an OA, followed by a phone screen by the HM. Then, an onsite interview with 4 engineers and one HM. All of them are coding questions. Only one has a design question, but it is very simple.
Generally, the interaction with the recruiter was positive. However, the onsite interview was not great at all. At least two interview rounds involved interviewers who didn't know the correct optimal solution. They essentially raised false doubts ab
I submitted my application via LinkedIn. After speaking with the recruiter, I had a phone screen. It involved basic questions and a coding exercise. Two weeks later, I completed the onsite interviews. I interviewed with five people from different g
Send an assignment as an OA, followed by a phone screen by the HM. Then, an onsite interview with 4 engineers and one HM. All of them are coding questions. Only one has a design question, but it is very simple.