Good benefits, good work-life balance, good compensation.
Bad tech debt, technical development environment still not optimal.
The interview was conducted via a platform called Karat, where you talk to an engineer over video chat and write code for a given problem live during the call. It's a unique way to conduct an interview, and I kind of liked it, despite it being a pre
It was similar to all major software companies: first, a phone technical interview. Then, the onsite consisted of: * Two technical interviews * One architecture interview, which still required some coding * One interview with a manager
The interview process was highly disrespectful of the candidate's time. Multiple interviewers did not come prepared, were late, or did not show up at all. The interview consisted of: - A recruiter phone screening (non-technical) - A coding interview
The interview was conducted via a platform called Karat, where you talk to an engineer over video chat and write code for a given problem live during the call. It's a unique way to conduct an interview, and I kind of liked it, despite it being a pre
It was similar to all major software companies: first, a phone technical interview. Then, the onsite consisted of: * Two technical interviews * One architecture interview, which still required some coding * One interview with a manager
The interview process was highly disrespectful of the candidate's time. Multiple interviewers did not come prepared, were late, or did not show up at all. The interview consisted of: - A recruiter phone screening (non-technical) - A coding interview