I was contacted by a technical sourcer. After a conversation with her, I decided that Pure Storage seemed like a very interesting company. The prospect of relocating to Prague, Czech Republic, made the opportunity even more appealing. I consulted with my family, and although it might not be easy initially, we agreed it could be a worthwhile opportunity for all of us.
The interview process consisted of eight online sessions:
Interviewers: All the interviewers were friendly, competent, and genuinely curious about my experience, skills, and knowledge. They always allotted at least 10 minutes at the end of each session for me to ask questions about Pure Storage’s processes, culture, etc.
Intermediate feedback session: I received detailed feedback from the interviewers, which was very positive overall. Consequently, I was approved for the second round.
Final feedback session: I did not receive an offer, which was fine. However, the reasons given were interesting. They concluded that I lacked sufficient motivation and energy during the interviews. When I asked if there was any feedback related to my motivation and energy, the recruiter gave no specific facts; he just repeated that there were no facts, only a conclusion.
My thoughts:
My modest advice: Either provide meaningful feedback at the end or skip those feedback sessions altogether. Otherwise, the effort and dedication of all company employees who conducted the technical and managerial interviews can be compromised. Moreover, the image of this generally interesting and attractive company could be harmed.
How do you motivate your team?
The following metrics were computed from 1 interview experience for the Pure Storage Engineering Manager role in Bulgaria.
Pure Storage's interview process for their Engineering Manager roles in Bulgaria is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having mixed feelings for Pure Storage's Engineering Manager interview process in Bulgaria.