Industry leader. Good compensation. High-paced work, execution-centric. Exposure to the cutting edge of technology. Capable and transparent management.
Poor work-life balance compared to others in the industry.
Large company means your domain of learning might become very narrow.
Although "partner" is one of the three pillars of Qualcomm's philosophy, it is very rare to see seamless partnership across teams/verticals. There is a lot of blame-shifting and reluctance to cooperate if incentives are misaligned.
It was an on-campus recruitment drive. It involved an online written test, followed by two technical interviews and one HR interview a week after the test results were released. The written test consisted of three sections: Quantitative Aptitude, Pr
I applied through college or university. The process took 1 day. Initially, it started with resume-related questions, trying to gauge my RTL design exposure. Later, they gave a small to medium-level problem to solve. I did around half of it. The int
There was an online test based on three fields: Software, VLSI, and Communication. We had to select one and undertake the test. It consisted of three parts: * Basic programming * Aptitude * The selected topic The shortlisted candidates' list was an
It was an on-campus recruitment drive. It involved an online written test, followed by two technical interviews and one HR interview a week after the test results were released. The written test consisted of three sections: Quantitative Aptitude, Pr
I applied through college or university. The process took 1 day. Initially, it started with resume-related questions, trying to gauge my RTL design exposure. Later, they gave a small to medium-level problem to solve. I did around half of it. The int
There was an online test based on three fields: Software, VLSI, and Communication. We had to select one and undertake the test. It consisted of three parts: * Basic programming * Aptitude * The selected topic The shortlisted candidates' list was an