I recently completed all stages of Ramp’s interview process. This included an initial CTF challenge, followed by two technical rounds (which I was told I performed very well on), and finally, rounds focused on technical, behavioral, and architectural discussions. I came prepared, felt aligned with the interviewers, and didn’t pick up on any signs of concern throughout.
Despite the time and energy invested, the final response was a brief note saying they wouldn't be moving forward—without any feedback or even a general comment like “it was a tough decision” or "sorry, but we're looking for someone with different experience.” While earlier rounds included constructive takeaways, the final stages offered nothing but a cold denial.
I’m very self-aware and typically can recognize when something hasn’t landed well, but in this case, there was little indication that anything was off. That’s exactly why feedback would have been valuable. As a candidate, you’re left wondering whether the issue was technical, communication-related, or something else entirely.
If you’re applying here, know that the process is structured and the team seems smart and kind—but don’t count on transparency or closure at the end if it doesn’t go your way. This can lead to a very negative and regrettable experience.
Good luck!
What are your thoughts around using AI?
The following metrics were computed from 8 interview experiences for the Ramp Senior Frontend Engineer role in United States.
Ramp's interview process for their Senior Frontend Engineer roles in the United States is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Ramp's Senior Frontend Engineer interview process in United States.