Strong company and strong C-level leadership. True desire to be customer focused and embrace agile practices. Willingness/desire to try new things and to dive deeper into the things that stick. Great amenities, good comp, generally upbeat culture.
Each office has its own character. The Austin office started with engineering functions. Sales started to grow and overtook engineering in size. The office continues to focus heavily on sales with an ever-dwindling technical team. It seems like most of the tech is moving to Belfast, Cambridge, or LA. Austin engineers feel like an outsourced team that is quick to take blame and incapable of getting too deep into (or integrating with) core products.
Austin management is quick-tempered and very politically motivated. Most of the time it's fine, but it does create unnecessary stress and snap judgments. But the desire is there.
Also... There is too much orange. It's not a great work environment color.
Do everything you can to minimize the 'good 'ol boy' environment that came from the sweat shop days. While those people deserve credit for all their hard work, they have the 'power' to set agile team policy- which kills true agility and teamwork. (Be agile.. just do it like this...)
I was called in for an in-person interview for the marketing team. Interview seemed to go well. I was given ridiculous feedback later about how I didn't want to be there and was arrogant because when asked how I would handle a poorly written pull r
First interview was basic questions on what type of person I was and how much I knew about the business. All pretty standard for the process. This led to a second interview where it was a technical interview, which was basically describing the archi
10 min call from recruiter that noticed me on Linked In. 30 min call with hiring manager to get some background information from me and describe the company / role. 30 minute call with senior engineer to do a generic technical screening problem 4
I was called in for an in-person interview for the marketing team. Interview seemed to go well. I was given ridiculous feedback later about how I didn't want to be there and was arrogant because when asked how I would handle a poorly written pull r
First interview was basic questions on what type of person I was and how much I knew about the business. All pretty standard for the process. This led to a second interview where it was a technical interview, which was basically describing the archi
10 min call from recruiter that noticed me on Linked In. 30 min call with hiring manager to get some background information from me and describe the company / role. 30 minute call with senior engineer to do a generic technical screening problem 4