WLB, interesting scale of problems, remote, decent pay.
Need more focus on engineering stability.
1 phone screen followed by an invitation to a couple of on-site interviews. Three out of the six on-site interviews were tech-focused (coding on a laptop). The remaining interviews were DevOps, product-oriented, and culture fit. Pros: Employees are
The interview process was disorganized and marked by significant delays in communication. Initial scheduling took over a week despite a prompt response. The first call started more than 15 minutes late, and follow-up information promised during that
1. Call with Hiring Manager 2. Call with Recruiter 3. Code Pair exercise 4. Virtual Onsite: * Manager discussion * Coding Exercise * System Design * Cross Functional / Behavioural Interview with Product Manager
1 phone screen followed by an invitation to a couple of on-site interviews. Three out of the six on-site interviews were tech-focused (coding on a laptop). The remaining interviews were DevOps, product-oriented, and culture fit. Pros: Employees are
The interview process was disorganized and marked by significant delays in communication. Initial scheduling took over a week despite a prompt response. The first call started more than 15 minutes late, and follow-up information promised during that
1. Call with Hiring Manager 2. Call with Recruiter 3. Code Pair exercise 4. Virtual Onsite: * Manager discussion * Coding Exercise * System Design * Cross Functional / Behavioural Interview with Product Manager