I applied through a recruiter. The process took 4 weeks.
The process started well. The recruiter was responsive, kept me updated at each step, and shared helpful preparation materials.
The first round was a coding interview. The interviewer was friendly and engaging, and the problem-solving discussion felt collaborative. The interview format was quite “high volume” in terms of questions/pace, but overall this stage was a good experience.
The next round was system design. I was asked to solve a business-oriented problem based on a few screenshots. This stage felt significantly less candidate-friendly: the interviewers seemed irritated when I asked clarifying questions, and there was an expectation to quickly define requirements and propose a solution for a Revolut Business–related scenario. In my view, it assumed detailed domain knowledge I hadn’t worked with before and wasn’t provided during the interview. After this round, I was told I was being evaluated at a lower level than originally discussed.
Afterwards, there was a team-matching stage. One team declined to proceed, citing “lack of motivation.” That particular conversation was scheduled at 8pm for me on a Friday, which may have affected how I came across. The second team-matching discussion was more productive, but overall I felt the atmosphere became increasingly tense as the process went on. The culture felt more “Russian-style” and not particularly aligned with what I’d expect from a Western company.
Overall: strong recruiter experience and a solid first technical round, but the later stages felt unstructured in expectations and less respectful in communication.
Code a problem using recycle views.
The following metrics were computed from 11 interview experiences for the Revolut Senior Android Developer role.
Revolut's interview process for their Senior Android Developer roles is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Revolut's Senior Android Developer interview process.