Good but sometimes the grass is greener else whefe
Good but sometimes the grass is greener else whefe
Good pay, decent leadership. Free lunch. Good performance is rewarded.
Surprise firings. No social perks.
Retention seems to be a big issue; even high performers seem to debate on leaving.
Additional Ratings
Was this helpful?
Rippling Interview Questions
Rippling Interview Experiences
Software Engineer
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 2 weeks. I had a phone screen with a coding problem that involved some object-oriented design. The most confusing part was the policy on AI tools. I was told that using AI was optional, so I chose not
Software Engineer
I was contacted by a recruiter agency, and the first round happened after a few days. The interview was mostly focused on DS & Algorithms. Then there were two more tech rounds and another round. I received an offer after two weeks of the process.
Software Engineer
A recruiter reached out to me and scheduled a technical screen through Zoom with a Rippling software engineer. The engineer gave a very brief introduction, then jumped straight into the question. The requirements of the question were vague and ill-
Software Engineer
San Francisco, California, United StatesOctober 21, 2026I applied through a recruiter. The process took 2 weeks. I had a phone screen with a coding problem that involved some object-oriented design. The most confusing part was the policy on AI tools. I was told that using AI was optional, so I chose not
Software Engineer
IndiaJuly 1, 2020I was contacted by a recruiter agency, and the first round happened after a few days. The interview was mostly focused on DS & Algorithms. Then there were two more tech rounds and another round. I received an offer after two weeks of the process.
Software Engineer
United StatesOctober 1, 2020A recruiter reached out to me and scheduled a technical screen through Zoom with a Rippling software engineer. The engineer gave a very brief introduction, then jumped straight into the question. The requirements of the question were vague and ill-
