I was first contacted by the recruiter, who was super friendly – probably the best recruiter I've ever met.
The second round was with the Hiring Manager, discussing my resume. It was okay.
Next was a panel interview with a presentation and six interviewers, lasting about four hours overall. One interviewer, a Level 2 Engineer, was probably the worst I have ever encountered. He didn't even know how long the interview session should be. When I mentioned 45 minutes, he reacted as if it was too long and a waste of his time. This created the first negative impression.
He had not prepared any proper questions for the interview. As a control engineer, he attempted to ask me control and thermodynamics questions, which were not relevant to the function of the role I applied for. He then switched to material questions. The way he asked them was so unstructured that I didn't know what he was looking for, even though I knew all the answers after about five minutes of clarification.
This individual's communication and interview skills were entirely out of his league, to the point that I questioned how he was hired.
One bad apple spoils the whole bunch.
After the interview, I understood why there are so many negative reviews about the company. This company does not deserve the recruiter I contacted.
Situational questions regarding their design process.
Technical questions not related to Design Release Engineer at all, such as knowledge of control and thermodynamics.
Basic material questions regarding the stress-strain curve and material choice.
The following metrics were computed from 2 interview experiences for the Rivian Design Release Engineer role in Irvine, California.
Rivian's interview process for their Design Release Engineer roles in Irvine, California is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having mixed feelings for Rivian's Design Release Engineer interview process in Irvine, California.