Great pay, great benefits. The platform has potential.
Senior leadership doesn't care about diversity and inclusion. They care about bringing their own "look-alike." Female and diverse candidates are second-class citizens. Management likes to pass on great candidates, citing they like to "verify" by using back-door references. How can this be fair to people that are helping build this thing?
You have a great product, but backdoors and politics are not fair practices.
I applied through an employee referral. The process took 2 months. The interview process was well-structured and transparent. It started with a recruiter screen, followed by technical interviews covering: * coding * data architecture * system design
The cognitive assignments and coding problems were very challenging. They used CodeSignal, and it was not proctored. The cognitive questions were about pattern recognition and problem-solving. This is the end.
The online assessment consisted of programming problems, collaboration questions, and Roblox games. It wasn't too difficult, but it did take a long time. Afterwards, the phone screen had two coding problems and a behavioral part.
I applied through an employee referral. The process took 2 months. The interview process was well-structured and transparent. It started with a recruiter screen, followed by technical interviews covering: * coding * data architecture * system design
The cognitive assignments and coding problems were very challenging. They used CodeSignal, and it was not proctored. The cognitive questions were about pattern recognition and problem-solving. This is the end.
The online assessment consisted of programming problems, collaboration questions, and Roblox games. It wasn't too difficult, but it did take a long time. Afterwards, the phone screen had two coding problems and a behavioral part.