I made a mistake by discussing my current compensation, where I had taken a pay cut as I was in a startup and they low-balled.
I negotiated for a while, but they had explanations like, "If we go beyond this, you will be above our current employees, and we can't do that."
But after getting the offer, I realized that's not the case.
I have experience where an internally referred resume, with a strong recommendation of a new grad with 5 years of experience, was not moving forward because they were not from Stanford or a top tier university.
There are still claims of mostly ex-Google/Facebook employees in marketing materials. This was true with the founding team, but I'm sure it is diluted now.
Respect people from all backgrounds. Smart people are beyond ex-employers and alumni.
Pay people right. However confidential it may be, these things get out, and you are going to make employees unhappy, which is detrimental.
The interview process involved: * 1 recruiter screen * 1 live coding screen (somewhat similar to LC snapshot array) * 5 rounds in the onsite, including: * 1 behavioral * 2 OS concurrency/mutual exclusion * 2 DSA The intervie
The interview process was very smooth. Recruiters were communicative, but you might have to push them a bit. In general, if you perform well, the manager will be after you.
Very much like any top engineering company – a good code test. I think it was clear they were looking for engineers that could deal with a lot of complexity and ambiguity.
The interview process involved: * 1 recruiter screen * 1 live coding screen (somewhat similar to LC snapshot array) * 5 rounds in the onsite, including: * 1 behavioral * 2 OS concurrency/mutual exclusion * 2 DSA The intervie
The interview process was very smooth. Recruiters were communicative, but you might have to push them a bit. In general, if you perform well, the manager will be after you.
Very much like any top engineering company – a good code test. I think it was clear they were looking for engineers that could deal with a lot of complexity and ambiguity.