Under the hood, SAP is a traditional German company with a strong hierarchy, a lot of bureaucracy, and politics.
In spite of PR, innovations are not promoted if this brings no benefit for your manager(s).
Very slow processes and developments.
You do not see how and by whom the product you are working on is used.
Strong budget limitations for some teams, but money with no limits for others. The criteria are how good your manager's relation to upper management is and which technology is currently a hype.
Promotion and salary increases are slow and limited.
High fluctuations.
SAP could be a great place for consultants, politicians, and managers, but as a software developer, you can find much better companies to work for.
A second interview might be a very in-depth one-on-one with the person you originally interviewed with. Alternatively, it can be a day-long interview that includes meetings with company staff. You may meet with: * Management * Staff members * Execu
The technical round was not specific to the job description. Though I tried to answer all questions, the interviewer was not satisfied. Updates from HR regarding the interview schedule and next steps are also quite slow.
Two rounds of technical interviews, heavy on DS/Algo, database querying and design, Java programming, and object-oriented design. One managerial/director round, which was also very technical. The director was very sharp and understood the depths of
A second interview might be a very in-depth one-on-one with the person you originally interviewed with. Alternatively, it can be a day-long interview that includes meetings with company staff. You may meet with: * Management * Staff members * Execu
The technical round was not specific to the job description. Though I tried to answer all questions, the interviewer was not satisfied. Updates from HR regarding the interview schedule and next steps are also quite slow.
Two rounds of technical interviews, heavy on DS/Algo, database querying and design, Java programming, and object-oriented design. One managerial/director round, which was also very technical. The director was very sharp and understood the depths of