I worked in the Vancouver office as a feature developer. It was a good experience, but wasn't anything special. The people were very nice, and the challenges were okay. I think it's a good company to give you industry exposure after university.
They offered paid lunches, where you could use a gift card and go to a number of restaurants around the area.
Good if you're looking for a stable job.
It was a little laid back. Personally, I didn't get anything technically interesting. But then again, I wasn't really passionate about Business Intelligence.
In hindsight, one thing my current company offers me that SAP didn't was a real sense of ownership, where I could challenge myself and work with some great people instead of simply doing what my manager told me to.
They asked about my resume, the projects, their size, and brief descriptions of two of them. They asked about principles of OOP and an example. They asked about kinds of testing. They also asked me to design a recursive algorithm.
One-hour behavior questions. The boss keeps asking questions about you. If you fail, you are not allowed to go to the technical interview. That's quite rare for an internship interview, and not friendly for people who do not have interview experien
Standard phone screening, followed by an on-site technical interview. The on-site questions were not that difficult, ranging from easy to mid-level. The interviewer was nice and friendly. The process was very slow, though, and a lot of people were co
They asked about my resume, the projects, their size, and brief descriptions of two of them. They asked about principles of OOP and an example. They asked about kinds of testing. They also asked me to design a recursive algorithm.
One-hour behavior questions. The boss keeps asking questions about you. If you fail, you are not allowed to go to the technical interview. That's quite rare for an internship interview, and not friendly for people who do not have interview experien
Standard phone screening, followed by an on-site technical interview. The on-site questions were not that difficult, ranging from easy to mid-level. The interviewer was nice and friendly. The process was very slow, though, and a lot of people were co