I believe there is almost none. Though one thing that comes to my mind is that you can see across engineering teams engineers who are senior engineers with level 3, but have the technical knowledge of a junior. I believe that comes a lot from managers and directors who are either inexperienced or sympathetic towards a number of engineers, and so they are promoting them.
There were two coding rounds, each 90 minutes long. Both problems were close to real use case scenarios, nothing like LeetCode. I liked them. I was able to finish both but got rejected. Overall, I had a positive impression.
After the initial recruiter call, I was required to complete a HackerRank task. The problem itself was easy, but the instructions were incomplete, forcing me to waste time reverse-engineering requirements based on failing test cases. Next was the co
The recruiter reached out to me based on my experience. I've had five different interviews with the CTO, director, and Principal Engineers, and now I think I've been ghosted. The problem is that the recruiter will take weeks to get back to you. The
There were two coding rounds, each 90 minutes long. Both problems were close to real use case scenarios, nothing like LeetCode. I liked them. I was able to finish both but got rejected. Overall, I had a positive impression.
After the initial recruiter call, I was required to complete a HackerRank task. The problem itself was easy, but the instructions were incomplete, forcing me to waste time reverse-engineering requirements based on failing test cases. Next was the co
The recruiter reached out to me based on my experience. I've had five different interviews with the CTO, director, and Principal Engineers, and now I think I've been ghosted. The problem is that the recruiter will take weeks to get back to you. The