The product idea is interesting, but many other defense companies are way ahead. There is nothing “special” about the product.
Before coming here I read a lot of negative reviews and decided to ignore them thinking they were most biased reviews from a small few of disgruntled employees. But now I realize that’s 99% of the employee base. Biggest mistake of my life was coming to this company. The executives use patriotism as an excuse to treat employees like poorly. The middle managers are lying out of their teeth to save their own careers, but lack the technical competence to manage. The product is is decades behind other industry leaders, even China. The organizational technical architecture is terrible, some of the worst I’ve seen in many years. The culture has some real issues; horribly toxic for a working woman. If you have kids you won’t have any time to spend 10 minutes with your kids or bring parents to hospital. You record your timed on 15 minute increments, and the executives have asked teams doing 80 hour a week should be upped to 100 hours a week on average.
And please note - any feedback you provide will be held against you on future reviews, even if they “say” it’s anonymous. They are actively using polls to try and weed out all the people who are posting negative reviews on indeed and blind, don’t be fooled. HR is also extremely unhelpful for almost any issue I have brought up to them.
Clean house of managers. Find people who can write better code and know more about the latest technologies. Stop trying to prevent bad reviews and focus on making your people truly satisfied first.
Communication was very quick, and the process was smooth. The interviews were in a conversational style with three stages: one behavioral, one technical, and another technical. Overall, the process was very friendly. The interviewer had creative ways
The recruiter was very well informed. The recruiter knew a lot of technical knowledge, better than most recruiters. He described the role and benefits. He was transparent about the pay. He was transparent about the process. It was a great phone scree
I applied online. The process took four weeks. - Zoom call with recruiter - Interview with hiring manager - Take-home coding round - On-site interview (four hours) Overall, it was a great experience. The on-site was more focused on team and culture
Communication was very quick, and the process was smooth. The interviews were in a conversational style with three stages: one behavioral, one technical, and another technical. Overall, the process was very friendly. The interviewer had creative ways
The recruiter was very well informed. The recruiter knew a lot of technical knowledge, better than most recruiters. He described the role and benefits. He was transparent about the pay. He was transparent about the process. It was a great phone scree
I applied online. The process took four weeks. - Zoom call with recruiter - Interview with hiring manager - Take-home coding round - On-site interview (four hours) Overall, it was a great experience. The on-site was more focused on team and culture