Great perks (gifts, salaries, events) and work-life balance - can log off after 5 p.m.
Not the best place to grow. Measuring your success more based on output rather than solving problems. Things are all over the place, projects don't even have PMs, and the projects you're working on could even get scrapped. Too many changes within the org make it hard to keep track of. It sucks that all your growth is dependent on your lead; if you get a mean lead, good luck getting a promotion. There's not much diversity. You could get stuck fixing accessibility issues all day.
The interview had two parts: a technical interview and a non-technical interview. Each was one hour long. The interviewer was nice, friendly, and calm, and the environment was modern. The technical interview was not hard and was average. The intervie
The interview process was enjoyable and engaging. The first interview involved discussing my life story. Following that, I had several interviews with staff members (three people plus one code test). The final interview was a code challenge.
15 Minute Recruiter Call 1 Hour Technical The interviewer did not know the solution other than the one written in front of him. He swayed me wrong and then rejected me upon loss of time.
The interview had two parts: a technical interview and a non-technical interview. Each was one hour long. The interviewer was nice, friendly, and calm, and the environment was modern. The technical interview was not hard and was average. The intervie
The interview process was enjoyable and engaging. The first interview involved discussing my life story. Following that, I had several interviews with staff members (three people plus one code test). The final interview was a code challenge.
15 Minute Recruiter Call 1 Hour Technical The interviewer did not know the solution other than the one written in front of him. He swayed me wrong and then rejected me upon loss of time.