Pros: - Lots of direct ownership and impact. - Great if you're starting out or mid-level.

Cons: - No room for growth or support for people wanting to develop further in their careers. - Thinks it's still a startup and great for those who believe it will get there.

Pros: Great pay, smart people, very flexible, good projects, free lunch in the office.

Cons: Bad WLB, mandatory return to office 4 days a week, weak executives with no vision, no bonuses for top performers.

Pros: Opportunity to make a large impact for feature development or performance improvement. Opportunity to work with smart and entrepreneurial people. Good, free food and drinks, and a reasonable allowance to eat from local restaurants as well. Strong intern program. Strong salary, stock, and refreshment program. Strong product review and engineering process for releases. Vision: Evan Spiegel and the Design team are awesome for product vision and discussing new ideas. Strong engineering leadership. Work/Life balance is fine. You don't have to work on weekends. It is similar to other large tech companies. Innovative and ambitious culture.

Cons: Don't have an established campus. Office space sucks compared to Google/Microsoft. Not much is established for a review/performance system. Too many new grads (but this is changing recently). The leveling system for engineers does not seem right. Each new stock vesting schedule is the same as the initial hiring stock. Favoritism for closeness to Evan or Directors/VPs, etc. Not enough conference rooms.