My onsite interview felt less like an interview and more like an interrogation.

The first interviewer talked extensively and jumped between topics, making a simple problem sound complex and confusing. He spoke for about 90% of the time during what seemed to be a half-design, half-coding interview, hardly giving me a chance to speak, process, or analyze the problem. Asking a simple clarifying question would lead to a long-winded, five-to-six-minute lecture that jumped all over the place.

The rest of the interviewers seemed more coherent. However, each session involved an interviewer coming online and rapidly bombarding me with question after question, in a manner that felt more like an interrogation and less like an interview.

The interviews were set up via email without speaking to the recruiter once. After the interviews, there was no response from the recruiter. Weeks later, I received an automated rejection email.

Going by the interview process, I highly doubt whether Splunk is a good place to work.

Interrogation-style interview.

Most questions had multiple parts.