There was a tech screen followed by an onsite with 4 rounds. The process was pretty organized until the tech screen.
There was some back and forth from their end to schedule the onsite, which was totally understandable. The recruiter was so responsive, but it turned out to be not useful for me, as she would not call me when she said she would.
I did pretty good on the onsite interview and I deserve to be, at the least, notified of the reject. I waited for two weeks since the virtual onsite was over, and it looked like the team was still not telling me the results. The recruiter kept telling me she'd share the results the next day, but she'd not.
I didn't expect such an irresponsive and disorganized process from such a big company. I had other offers to move on with, and till now, I didn't get the results despite following up with them 3 times. I would not recommend having any hope while interviewing for such companies.
Medium level questions - NDA
The following metrics were computed from 93 interview experiences for the Splunk Software Engineer role in United States.
Splunk's interview process for their Software Engineer roles in the United States is very selective, failing most engineers who go through it.
Candidates reported having mixed feelings for Splunk's Software Engineer interview process in United States.