It took around two months for them to review my CV, after which a call was scheduled with a recruiter. They were clearly situated in a vast open-plan area with a lot of background noise. The recruiter made no effort to be personable or to "sell" Spotify; they seemed pretty bored and disinterested.
After the screening call, I was told that they wanted me to proceed to the next stage, but that I first needed to complete a 30-minute online test. I did the test, which "scientifically" claimed I was "above average" for various logic and pattern-matching tasks. I didn't hear anything from them for two weeks. Then, I received an automated email informing me that I was not moving forward to the next round.
It seems they have so many candidates that they have forgotten they are speaking with smart, talented applicants who have choices of where to work. Throughout the process, your application sits in a black box with no means of contacting anyone who emails you (they hide behind their system's no-reply email addresses). This means you cannot inquire about progress.
My advice to Spotify would be to consider the damage that your recruiting teams are doing to your brand. You are falling way short of the standard offered by other, much larger firms with even more applicants. Also, ditch the pseudo-science tests.
Typical behavioral and experience questions.
The following metrics were computed from 4 interview experiences for the Spotify Engineering Manager role in Stockholm, Sweden.
Spotify's interview process for their Engineering Manager roles in Stockholm, Sweden is very selective, failing most engineers who go through it.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Spotify's Engineering Manager interview process in Stockholm, Sweden.