I applied online, and the process took four weeks.
It was a nice chat with a nice person, and it was 45 minutes.
To me, this is kind of a red flag, but one I was willing to see past. If after nine years this company is still prioritizing adaptability to changing constraints, then that might be a sign of a few internal issues. Something to consider. This was also 45 minutes.- Reference check: They finally asked me to gather three references. I am not sure if they called them because I received a rejection letter shortly after that. Don't worry, my friends didn't torpedo me.To summarize everything, there were three different 30- to 45-minute conversational interviews, two 45-minute technical assessments, a 20-minute timed cognitive assessment, and a reference check.
While I think everyone was friendly and answered my questions confidently, I think I'm ultimately going to disapprove of the experience. It did not feel particularly respectful of my time and effort and had elements that I felt could be unfair to some, like the cognitive and behavioral assessments. I know interviewing is something companies are always trying to improve on, so perhaps when you read this review they will have tweaked their process. But this was what it was for me at the time of writing.
Are you able to be adaptable in an environment where constraints could suddenly change? (paraphrasing)
The following metrics were computed from 3 interview experiences for the Spring Health Senior Software Engineer II role.
Spring Health's interview process for their Senior Software Engineer II roles is extremely selective, failing the vast majority of engineers.
Candidates reported having very negative feelings for Spring Health's Senior Software Engineer II interview process.