You get to meet a lot of talented people from various domains. Less working hours. Could be a good opportunity only for freshers.
My review here is to clarify the kind of work at Swiggy Labs and Labs only. Work at Swiggy is much different. You might have to go through other reviews for that.
Labs might seem lucrative during the hiring process (you're just shown the positive sides of working here) and in the initial stages of your journey here. Only after 3-4 months of working here will you understand the reality.
It was tough for me and everyone in Engg. to justify the work we've done here for the past 1+ years in the interviews for the next jobs. I do not want any other engineer to face the same.
And yes, almost every engineer started looking out after completion of their 1 year. The only reason you'd want to wait a year is to save yourself the joining bonus and to vest the esops.
TLDR; could be a good opportunity for freshers. Waste of time for anyone with more than 2 years of experience.
"Swiggy", "Labs" and "drones" might sound really fancy during the hiring process. Please clarify the kind of work they're supposed to do at Labs. It would help in making an informed decision.
You need a tech leader. You can't expect people to work without a good leader in place. You can't get the perspective of your tech people without you being a techie yourselves.
Having a couple of creators who haven't written a single line of code for over a year are not the leaders techies look up to.
Good that you recognize work done by product and business folks. You should sometime do the same for your engineers as well.
If there is no challenging tech work, you can just hire freshers out of college and still make it work. At least, they would get to learn something new.
I genuinely couldn’t have imagined the interview process would unfold in such a manner. It was far from a pleasant experience—particularly surprising and disappointing, given the company's status as a unicorn. One would naturally expect a more struc
There were 3 rounds: 2 DSA rounds and 1 managerial round. For the DSA questions, topics included graphs and arrays. Overall, it was a good interview experience with the team. For the managerial round, questions related to work experience were asked.
There were a total of three rounds of interviews, followed by a director's round. The first two rounds focused on coding and problem-solving, while the third round was dedicated to design and scale.
I genuinely couldn’t have imagined the interview process would unfold in such a manner. It was far from a pleasant experience—particularly surprising and disappointing, given the company's status as a unicorn. One would naturally expect a more struc
There were 3 rounds: 2 DSA rounds and 1 managerial round. For the DSA questions, topics included graphs and arrays. Overall, it was a good interview experience with the team. For the managerial round, questions related to work experience were asked.
There were a total of three rounds of interviews, followed by a director's round. The first two rounds focused on coding and problem-solving, while the third round was dedicated to design and scale.