Only one product, so the whole company pushes in the same direction. Very collaborative.
Good small-company feel, even though the company is growing. Ability to make a difference, no matter your position.
Processes are not well defined, so there's a lot of ambiguity and things get dropped on the floor sometimes.
We sometimes have crunch times, although this is getting better.
May be growing too fast to maintain its company culture.
Overall, the interview was average. Most of the interviewers were polite. I just had one rude interviewer that left a bad taste. They have two engineers per interview, usually one in the room and another over a video conference system. Most quest
One phone interview and then an on-site interview with five rounds of algorithm, system, and design questions. Each round had two people. I did pretty well, except I wasn't perfect on one of the system questions.
The typical interview process included a recruiter phone screen followed by a technical phone screen. The on-site portion consisted of six interviews, each with a panel of two interviewers. One of these was a lunch interview. The recruiter was respo
Overall, the interview was average. Most of the interviewers were polite. I just had one rude interviewer that left a bad taste. They have two engineers per interview, usually one in the room and another over a video conference system. Most quest
One phone interview and then an on-site interview with five rounds of algorithm, system, and design questions. Each round had two people. I did pretty well, except I wasn't perfect on one of the system questions.
The typical interview process included a recruiter phone screen followed by a technical phone screen. The on-site portion consisted of six interviews, each with a panel of two interviewers. One of these was a lunch interview. The recruiter was respo