Cool technology, cool CEO. Other engineers are sharp and very nice/great to work with. Prestigious. All the walking around the big plant keeps you in shape.
Management, management, management. Normally, when you say someone is crazy, it’s a figure of speech. But many of us think that my boss is clinically mentally ill, and his boss isn’t much better (at least neurotic).
And there was another manager who was just evil, his face always like a stone, attacking/destroying people right and left (usually new employees who didn’t know enough yet to defend themselves).
Pay is the lowest in the valley. I hadn’t been paid this little since the late 90s.
The company has the highest turnover rate of any company I’ve ever seen. It’s hard to find people who have been there more than a year or so. You can never decompress/relax/reenergize because your boss will be e-mailing you evenings and weekends, expecting an immediate response. You always have to be "on."
Tesla had to commandeer part of the cafeteria full-time to hold the continuing string of interviews needed to counter the stream of people leaving. With all their job listings, I’d always thought they must be expanding like crazy, but it’s actually just to compensate for the turnover.
Tesla’s business model appears to be this:
Noted short seller Jim Chanos is shorting Tesla, saying that the exodus of executives strongly correlates with companies that are heading for a crash. I know firsthand that they spend massively on projects in their factory that make no economic sense, justifying it by saying, “This will look so cool on the tour route!” Shades of the dot-com bubble, circa 1999…
Retake Engineering Economics 101.
Also, allow your people some work/life balance so that you can retain people for more than a year and not have to spend all your time interviewing and training replacements.
The interviewer asked highly academic questions, drawing from small details in old college textbooks that were not relevant to the job. The interviewer's attitude was somewhat disrespectful and condescending. This was, overall, a negative experience.
I applied on the career website and received an email from a recruiter. I then had an initial phone screen, followed by phone interviews with a manager and a senior manager. These interviews were standard, focusing on describing past experiences and
The first interview was a set of programming questions. The in-person follow-up was 3-4 hours long and involved a team of people. I presented a PowerPoint of past projects and experience and was asked several technical questions in response.
The interviewer asked highly academic questions, drawing from small details in old college textbooks that were not relevant to the job. The interviewer's attitude was somewhat disrespectful and condescending. This was, overall, a negative experience.
I applied on the career website and received an email from a recruiter. I then had an initial phone screen, followed by phone interviews with a manager and a senior manager. These interviews were standard, focusing on describing past experiences and
The first interview was a set of programming questions. The in-person follow-up was 3-4 hours long and involved a team of people. I presented a PowerPoint of past projects and experience and was asked several technical questions in response.