The work is very interesting.
I have to write a cons.
The interview process was standard. A screening followed by an onsite of 2 coding, 2 system design, and a behavioral interview. The coding onsites: 1 is a standard LeetCode-style question, and the other is an Object-Oriented style interview. System
The most unprofessional and frustrating interview I had in 20 years. * You are presented with crappy code you are supposed "to refactor," but you are not allowed to change the internals, like the type of data structure used. * Compilation is broken,
1. Recruiter screen, questions about salary expectations and past work. 2. Coding round: Pretty straightforward question. They give you some material in advance to prepare, so it can be achieved on time. It's mostly about refactoring and achieving t
The interview process was standard. A screening followed by an onsite of 2 coding, 2 system design, and a behavioral interview. The coding onsites: 1 is a standard LeetCode-style question, and the other is an Object-Oriented style interview. System
The most unprofessional and frustrating interview I had in 20 years. * You are presented with crappy code you are supposed "to refactor," but you are not allowed to change the internals, like the type of data structure used. * Compilation is broken,
1. Recruiter screen, questions about salary expectations and past work. 2. Coding round: Pretty straightforward question. They give you some material in advance to prepare, so it can be achieved on time. It's mostly about refactoring and achieving t