TSMC

Equipment Engineer Interview Experience - Phoenix, Arizona

December 1, 2024

Positive ExperienceGot Offer

Process

One behavioral assessment with two interview rounds.

First one is technical - about how your resume relates to the field and asked a few brain teaser questions.

Second one is behavioral - about how your work.

Questions

What do you know about the semiconductor manufacturing process?

Was this helpful?

Interview Statistics

The following metrics were computed from 23 interview experiences for the TSMC Equipment Engineer role in Phoenix, Arizona.

Success Rate

39%

Pass Rate

TSMC's interview process for their Equipment Engineer roles in Phoenix, Arizona is fairly selective, failing a large portion of engineers who go through it.

Experience Rating

Positive70%

Neutral22%

Negative9%

Candidates reported having very good feelings for TSMC's Equipment Engineer interview process in Phoenix, Arizona.

TSMC Work Experiences

Good pay. That's about it

Equipment Engineer • Current Employee

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

January 30, 2024

Pros: Good pay for the industry.

Cons: Horrible management, backwards thinking, long hours.

Good pay. That's about it

Equipment Engineer • Current Employee

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

January 30, 2024

Pros: Good pay for the industry.

Cons: Horrible management, backwards thinking, long hours.

Good Pay, Toxic Culture

Equipment Engineer • Current Employee

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Pros: Good pay, good benefits, ESPP.

Cons: Overtime, bad company culture, long hours, weekend shifts, no communication, stressful work environment.

Good Pay, Toxic Culture

Equipment Engineer • Current Employee

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Pros: Good pay, good benefits, ESPP.

Cons: Overtime, bad company culture, long hours, weekend shifts, no communication, stressful work environment.

Toxic from the top

Equipment Engineer • Former Employee

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Pros: The pay rate was higher than industry standards.

Cons: Toxic leadership and culture. Hourly employees were not allowed overtime; instead, the work was shifted to salaried employees, with the expectation of 12-hour days, 5 days a week in office.

Toxic from the top

Equipment Engineer • Former Employee

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Pros: The pay rate was higher than industry standards.

Cons: Toxic leadership and culture. Hourly employees were not allowed overtime; instead, the work was shifted to salaried employees, with the expectation of 12-hour days, 5 days a week in office.

Good pay. That's about it

Equipment Engineer • Current Employee

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

January 30, 2024

Pros: Good pay for the industry.

Cons: Horrible management, backwards thinking, long hours.

2.0
Good pay. That's about it
Equipment Engineer • Current Employee
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
January 30, 2024
Pros: Good pay for the industry.
Cons: Horrible management, backwards thinking, long hours.

Good Pay, Toxic Culture

Equipment Engineer • Current Employee

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Pros: Good pay, good benefits, ESPP.

Cons: Overtime, bad company culture, long hours, weekend shifts, no communication, stressful work environment.

1.0
Good Pay, Toxic Culture
Equipment Engineer • Current Employee
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
April 15, 2025
Pros: Good pay, good benefits, ESPP.
Cons: Overtime, bad company culture, long hours, weekend shifts, no communication, stressful work environment.

Toxic from the top

Equipment Engineer • Former Employee

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Pros: The pay rate was higher than industry standards.

Cons: Toxic leadership and culture. Hourly employees were not allowed overtime; instead, the work was shifted to salaried employees, with the expectation of 12-hour days, 5 days a week in office.

1.0
Toxic from the top
Equipment Engineer • Former Employee
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
August 7, 2024
Pros: The pay rate was higher than industry standards.
Cons: Toxic leadership and culture. Hourly employees were not allowed overtime; instead, the work was shifted to salaried employees, with the expectation of 12-hour days, 5 days a week in office.

Copyright © Taro