You're judged based on the number of lines of code/commits that you do. So, if you work on a complex fix or feature with little code, you're screwed. You can write dumb code that doesn't work, but it doesn't matter because you're only reviewed by the quantity that you write, not the quality.
Move to story points instead of the number of commits.
The person responsible for monitoring my live code finished the challenge before the agreed-upon time. I spoke with HR, but it was no use.
The interviewers were nice and patient, and willing to give hints. However, I later discovered the exact same problem on LeetCode and realized that my interviewers had given the wrong direction.
The process was very straightforward. First, the HR manager contacted me, and we had a 15-minute chat where we discussed salary, perks, vacations, etc. It was pretty standard. After that, I received an invitation to a technical interview.
The person responsible for monitoring my live code finished the challenge before the agreed-upon time. I spoke with HR, but it was no use.
The interviewers were nice and patient, and willing to give hints. However, I later discovered the exact same problem on LeetCode and realized that my interviewers had given the wrong direction.
The process was very straightforward. First, the HR manager contacted me, and we had a 15-minute chat where we discussed salary, perks, vacations, etc. It was pretty standard. After that, I received an invitation to a technical interview.